Thursday, September 14, 2006

Citizens for Port Development information.

Eureka City Council Candidates face off at Samoa Cookhouse

The Citizens for Port Development hosted a forum for the Eureka City Council candidates at the Cookhouse in Samoa on Wednesday the 13th. Third Ward incumbent Jeff Leonard was the first to give an opening statement, and feels Humboldt Bay is a big resource that needs to be taken advantage of. He pointed out the abundance of jobs in 1983 and would like to see the area grow with new development. Next up was First Ward candidate Tish Wilburne. In her opening statements she said she was there to say what is on her mind and to speak the truth, “There is NO port and rail development. It is not happening in my lifetime!” Citizens for Port Development members peppered her with questions on how she could qualify those statements, and moderator Kay Strickland had to step in and bring the meeting back to order. Nancy Abrams, candidate for the Fifth Ward seat introduced herself as “Nan.” She has lived in Eureka for 15 years after living in Fresno. She is a Social Welfare Counselor who helps people in Eureka through the Welfare to Work program process. She feels the success on her job depends on local business growth. She is a self admitted environmentalist who is running because she feels there is a “better way to do business.” Third Ward challenger Ron Kuhnel agreed with Leonard that the bay was a big resource. Concerning development, Kuhnel felt that there was a need to balance economic and environmental impact. As far as new business he felt the need to “learn, analyze, sympathize then act.”” If there are no jobs, there is no community.” First Ward candidate Larry Glass has been a local business owner for 35 years. He considers himself an environmentalist and long time advocate for rail perseverance. He actually jumped the rails to Santa Rosa in the 1970’s and described the beauty of the landscape. He feels the need of “fair and open transparent local government,” with no “deals in the backroom.”

Answering the first question as to how the candidates felt the community could grow business wise, Glass wanted no hidden projects that were being processed “out of view” and said the “community should set the standards.” Leonard pointed out that there were limited customers and transportation problems. “We need to find partnerships and use available loans.” Leonard then pointed out that, “Just because you use the public process, doesn’t guarantee you will get your way.” Ms. Abrams felt a local problem was a bad workforce that was limited and had social issues. She felt that may have contributed to Trader Joe’s not locating in Humboldt County. Ms. Wilburne stepped away from the front speaker area and sat with the audience instead of fielding questions on this issue.

The Marina Project was a question that brought up emotions from all the candidates and audience. Kuhnel said it is a work in progress. “There is a long way go. There has been no public process and it needs to be a collaborated effort to work.” Abrams said felt the traffic issues were important. “Broadway can not handle 4,000 additional vehicles a day.” She also felt the local public needed “to own in spirit” the process. Wilburne returned to the speaking area to express her wishlist of a polo field, dog park and model boat area. Leonard said he could not say yes or no to the project, but will follow the process to the end. “People are using the area illegally and we (the public) are paying for services we are not getting a return on. I want to see it usable.” Glass felt the public has been shut out of the process and used the opportunity to announce that the Citizens for Real Economic Growth (CREG) would be holding an informational public meeting concerning the Balloon Tract alternatives October 13 at the Warfinger building at the Eureka Marina. “If the Arkley project is what the public decides is best, I am fine with that. It is all about public input” Glass said.

From the audience, Security National (SN) representative Brian Morrissey said that traffic concerns would be mitigated and then challenged Glass to disclose finances from CREG polling expenditures. Glass said the money came from his own pocket. Glass asked Morrissey about other developers who had interest in the project area and was told no other developers had or have any interest in the Balloon Track. Another SN representative Randy Gans identified himself as a 32 year resident that wanted to know why the other 137 undeveloped available acres in the city of Eureka are not an issue. Glass answered that the other land was not prime area such as the Balloon Track.

Current Eureka City Council members Mike Jones of the Fifth Ward and Mary Beth Wolford from the First Ward were not present for the forum.

Citizens for Port Development Chair Kay Strickland ended the meeting with this statement, “Never give up on the railroad. Stay with the process.”

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Great summary. What are your thoughts on this?

samoasoftball said...

I think most of the candidates answered the questions fairly. I was quite impressed with Ron Kuhnel and Jeff Leonard. But they are running against each other. They are both Democrats and I think have Eureka's best interest in mind. I have done business with Glass as a consumer pretty much since Bazar closed. They always had the eclectic music. Things like Mott the Hoople, Roxy Music, Sparks, Alex Harvey, Greg Kihn stuff off the wall. So I have had mostly positive dealings so I may be prejudice, but I like Larry and probably relate to him more in life than Mary Beth, who is also a fellow Democrat. I wish she was there to hear. Nan Abrams is a fellow union member/Democrat. Both of us have over 30 years in the rank and file and she had good answers. I consider Mike Jones a friend and I think he has Eureka's best interest at heart. He doesn't do it for the money that is for sure. Tish is of course straight up. What you see and hear is what you get. I like the changes to the Marina Center project, but am still hedging. I hope to make the CREG meeting and keep an open mind. Once they add a softball field element....all bets off and I am sold! Actually stay tuned, I have some good arguments for the project and against.

Anonymous said...

"Ms. Abrams felt a local problem was a bad workforce that was limited and had social issues. She felt that may have contributed to Trader Joe’s not locating in Humboldt County."

I'm not sure what she means by this. Any clue? I probably need to ask her. Is she saying our current work force is limited in certain skills? As in construction skills? Retail stills? Management skills?

Social issues? Is she saying our workforce or community has social issues that won't allow Trader Joe's to locate here? Does that mean the Trader Joe's corporation completed a study to see if they had any prospective customers and found our community wouldn't fulfill their quotas?

I'm sorry, I really don't mean to pick on on certain candidate. But some of these folks really don't have a grasp on how business works.

A polo field?

Gosh, running for office to represent the community doesn't mean you have this wonderful wish list that is going to be filled.
It's a lot of nuts and bolts,
truly mundane stuff that the rest of the community doesn't want to contend with.

Wow, Bazaar. I loved the roller track where you placed on your bins of groceries and watched them roll out to your car. And the attendant helped you load them. Remember when it was called Disco?

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
samoasoftball said...

Nan never explained why Trader Joe's did not locate here. Yes, I remember Disco! That was the owner right before Bazar. I worked at Bazar from 1974 to 1978. It was agreat place to work and it was union! Retail Clerks.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

8:20 AM said:
"Gosh, running for office to represent the community doesn't mean you have this wonderful wish list that is going to be filled.
It's a lot of nuts and bolts,
truly mundane stuff that the rest of the community doesn't want to contend with. "

REALLY? You mean I can't just run for office to get the ONE issue I'm fired up about resolved?? There's more to it than that? Bummer.
(sarcasm intended)