North Coast Rail Authority rolling toward the Black? Bay
area wants Mad River water? February Meeting in Healdsburg.
All nine Directors were present for the February meeting.
Former Director Gus Wolter was recognized for his past service. The board
discussed Committee reports for the Property and Finance Committees before we
had our first conduct of business, which was Discussion of Reinstatement of
Stipend (or pay) for the Board Members. I spoke against and the other Directors
agreed to table until next year. We then approved a financial audit by Pisenti
and Brinker and approved an agreement between the NCRA and Parallel
Infrastructure for Auditing services that will actually bring in monies for identified
Right of Ways.
Executive Director Mitch Stogner reported on a letter sent
to the Sonoma-Marin Area Rapid Transit (SMART ) concerning 16 turnout projects
needed by North Western Pacific Co. (NWPco) between Novato and Santa Rosa. Mr.
Stogner also reported on Project Engineer John Anderson’s pre-feasibility type
estimate of repairing 52 miles of rail line form Windsor to Ukiah. There is interest by the Chinese Rail
Institute through HJI Group to fund this potential 40 million dollar expansion
project.
Property Specialist Doug McCorkle has had inquiry by the
Humboldt Bay Municipal Water District of potential water pipeline from Mad
River to the Bay Area using the NCRA rail Right of Way. Quite shocking for the
Humboldt Directors and first I had heard of that.
NWPco Operator John Williams said he needed more of the
turnouts active and spurs available for more business. Would really like to see
expansion to Cloverdale at least. Would prefer the NCRA pursue grants rather
than loans. NWPco now servicing 7 businesses with 15 to 20 loads a week and
ready to make a profit.
The above picture is the service of barley to Lagunitas in
Petaluma. The Below picture is of NWPco operating through heavy rain near Shellville
on Feb. 10th, 2014. Yes, rail is currently up and running.
2 comments:
The idea of selling water- one thing we do have up here, usually- caught my interest some time ago. Until I realized once we committed ourselves to providing water to other parts of the state we'd likely lose control over it completely.
What if a miracle happened and some industry requiring water had a chance to open here, but that water was committed to other areas?
Would we still be committed to sell water if our own supplies ran short due to drought? Who knows? I'm not sure I want to find out.
Can anyone explain to me why Eureka even has a separate position called mayor? Why not do it like every other city and have your five councilmembers and the mayorship rotate around? What a waste. And now the biggest election battle of the year is over the mayorship? A position with no clout or responsibility other than to read a script during councilmeetings? Just get rid of the position and save us from the grief.
Post a Comment