One of my friends jokingly referred to Measure Z as, "Zero chance of passing!" I have talked to quite a few people of varying political spectrum and have heard a resounding "NO!" I voted for the Measure but can't speak for my wife. I find it odd that many I have talked to are for Measure "Q" though. If I were Natalie Arroyo and Kim Bergel I would hope "Q" passes or I wouldn't want to be the new Eureka City Council person with a huge deficit on the horizon!
Just heard that
Mark Sprague is launching Homers in Heaven. I was honored to have Mark as a
teammate, coworker and friend. His brother Basil "Bill" went a few
years earlier. Dave and Bob are still with us. Played ball with them all and
won many games and have great memories, both in slow pitch and fast pitch, here
are others. Only a few of the many comments going around:
guy...had some great times!JJ
Mark. Hell of a ball player and fun guy to be around.Carlos AvelarHe
was a tough competitor but always fair person that pulled for success of others
as well but you knew you were in for a game if the other team ever had a
Sprague on it and sometimes multiple Spragues they all always brought their A+
GAME. Kris AvelarWell
said Clos . I remember when he made an unassisted triple play n willow creek.
And basil was doing head first slides on a shit field and had a huge raspberry
on his chest. Great family and will be missed by many. Doug WeatherbeeHad
the pleasure of playing next to Mark on some of the best teams I ever played
for. We were complete opposites on the field. Mark was always chirping.lol. But
always in a good way and made me work harder and be a better player. He was fun
to play with and we became good friends. I can see Mark and Bill reunited and
already winning together in heaven. I will miss you Mark.Rick VerhulstI
concur Doug Weatherbee
! Mark always pumped me up when we played together. Sounds silly but he made me
feel like I was the best pitcher out there cuz he was so supportive!Steve GeorgiannaVery
lucky to of known him and played with him. So much fun!
Great story in Times Standard this morning. But a simple statement by Humboldt County 5th District Supervisor Ryan Sundberg explaining Humboldt County Cannabis Voice-Humboldt type cannabis farmers, "They are saying, 'We want to be regulated, we want to be taxed, help me help you figure out how to make that happen!"
It is not that simple, but it was a huge step forward as yesterday I witnessed 35 stakeholders work together to find consensus on many of the main land use issues. I actually finished a draft of the Ordinance last night and sent it off to our legal "Draft Team" to massage and move forward. I am excited to be a part of the process to help growers who want to do clean growing practices. I am not supportive of trespass grows or grows using illegal pesticides or that divert water illegally. I feel we are headed in the right direction.
California Cannabis Voice-Humboldt will be hosting 35 cannabis stakeholders (People with interest or concern, in this case Board of Supervisors, Planning Department, Environmental groups, Medical Industry, Business Owners and Cannabis Farmers.) participating in a critical process that will create a Humboldt County Ordinance setting reasonable cannabis agricultural guidelines for growing. Those stakeholders will help craft the guidelines in the form of the Ordinance "on the run" while being lead by Professional Bay Area Facilitator Dr. Debrorah Pruitt. The "Draft" of the Ordinance will be created by committee with renown attorney Dorgi Roberts, a former Deputy City Attorney of San Francisco, leading the process. The "Draft" of the Ordinance will be vetted by the public with the first planned forum hosted by the Blue Lake Rancheria at the Sapphire Palace November 6th in the form of a panel discussion. This is a chance to Decriminalize the reasonable cannabis growers by Legitimizing their processes and letting them be Humanized by coming out of the shadows and contribute taxes to the County.
I am asking you all to support school bond Measure S. It is a benefit to the children currently in the Eureka City Schools system and will pave way to a better quality of education for the future. Yes, I realize there was a bond measure in 2002 that is not paid off, but don't punish the current children or staff for ills of the past administration. Yes, I went to school in Eureka. And I own property in Eureka so I will be helping foot the bill.
The Eureka Rotary club with help of the League of Women
Voters (LOWV) hosted a Eureka City Council candidates forum.Challengers Kim Bergel
(KB) and Natalie Arroyo (NA) were present as were
incumbents Mike Newman
(MN) and Chet Albin (CA). Questions were
filtered by the LOWV. The first question was:
What do you see as the biggest problem or
Challenge in Eureka?
said there were three problems, homeless, addiction and the economy.She pointed out solutions such as streamlining
permitting processes, developing the port and build on strengths. MN pointed out problems doing business
in the county.Spoke about homeless
solution through Community Homeless Improvement Project (CHIP). CA spoke
of a recent 4million dollar budget cut. Need to find revenue sources. NA said we need to focus on a diverse
economy and not put all our eggs in one basket. She is running on jobs issue.
Would like to see a ten year strategy including medical residency, tech jobs
and beautifying the area while using targets of opportunity such as using the
General Plan for industrial development.
Measure R may send businesses out of town,
what will you do?
MN “This is the elephant in the room and the question of the day!” Pointed
out the movement was driven by Occupy Eureka and it was already hard to do
business here. NA said there was a
need for higher wages and added the need in the county. KB completely supports Measure R and said it would take people off
welfare, creates more taxes and empowers people. “What we are doing now not
working!” CA “What if they leave?
Not much we can do.” Said it could cost hundreds of jobs and lower the tax base
and close more businesses.
Did you or would you have agreed to give
Eureka Department Heads a raise considering Eureka budget issues?
NA “We need a talented staff.” Said there was a need for system
upgrading. CA said there was research done several
years ago on how to attract department heads. Not many apply to Eureka. He said
he would have reluctantly voted for the raises. MN reiterated the need to attract decent workers. That has been the
goal the last few years. Said there was police reporting upgrades. KB “Look at what we got!” Said the city
was forward thinking.
Do you support crisis training for the
CA “Yes, we need intervention” Brought up homeless issue and CHIP. KB “Absolutely.”She said this subject was a
black eye to our community for improper training. “Treat people with dignity
and respect!” NA “Absolutely. Need to deal with the challenges and the gaps
between County Mental Health and Health care. Don’t put ill people back out in
the street! “ MN Was in agreement
and said Mental Health working with patrol officers in training important. Do you support Measure Q?
NA “Yes. It is only an extension of existing tax.” Does not want to
see elimination of city jobs. MN “Yes.
In 2010 we thought we wouldn’t need to, but we didn’t get new business.” He
said that 71% of the Measure “O” money went to law enforcement. Also said that
not having the extension would eliminate “POP.” KB “Absolutely.” She has done ride-along with both Police and Fire.
Pointed out leaky roofs and need of turnouts. Not a new tax. CA “I support “Q. If it fails we will
lose POP, 9 traffic officers and 6 Firemen. Response for services will be
What can you do strategically to solve
MN “We are working on the problems, and now implementing solutions
such as Motel Ordinance service calls.” NA
Pointed out that Homeless sometimes comes in stages such as living in a car
as first step. Need to examine substance abuse element. CA “CHIP
has come a long way.” Need to look for solutions to long term hospital stays
with alternate medical housing. KB “Never going to eradicate the homeless.”
Advocates use of Betty Chin programs and rapid housing programs.
Will consolidating Fire Department help?
NA “I need to know more. I thought we were already. Said she will
do more homework.” KB Said she was
confused by question and would do homework. MN “It has happened and has saved the city $185,000.” CA “Yes. It has happened already and
the savings is helping the Fire Departments.
NA Identified Labor endorsements and other individuals and the
Democratic Central Committee. Respectfully asked for peoples vote. CA Lived many years in Eureka and wants
to continuing giving back and has served on the Planning, Housing and Parking
commissions. MN Wants to keep moving
forward and provides “More bang for the buck.” Has been the leader in
consolidating departments and promotes more business through developing a deep
water port with living wage jobs. KB Promotes
change with 21st Century thinking. Wants to break barriers that
separate the community. She says she works well with others and points out the
need to work together.
recently attended a California Marine Affairs and Navigation Conference
in San Francisco. They are a gathering of California harbors, ports and marine
interest groups. It originated in the 1950’s. The mission of CMANC is to
optimize California maritime benefits by providing advocacy for the maintenance
and improvement of California harbors, ports and navigation projects. CMANC
works with the California legislature and congressional delegation to make sure
that California maritime interests are supported by the federal and state
government to the greatest extent possible. CMANC address such issues as beach
erosion, dredging impact, and taxing policies on navigation, seeking regulatory
reforms, and to assure adequate recognition of the importance of commercial
navigation, fisheries and water-related recreation. This was my first meeting.
first presenter was Mark Toy Brigadier General of the Army Corp of Engineers. He
is the commanding General for the South Pacific Division. Faced a 25% reduction
of staff but still optimistic to be able to do the job. He plans to visit all 27
California Ports and Harbors. The Corps dredge 10million cubic yards annually
and remove 1,200 tons of debris from SF Harbor alone!
first panel discussion was on Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL’s) and Dredge
Placements. Talk was around Regional Monitoring Programs and whether testing
frequency should be considered or averaging period. Lots of threshold numbers
were introduced. Beneficial reuse of Dredge materials was another topic with
mostly roadblocks such as clean material vs. bad and lack of lands that material
can be barged to. Steve Low from the Port of Oakland gave some statistics from
his port. They dredge 100,000 cy a year for 2.7 million. Problem is fewer
disposal sites and costs are on the rise. Then a presentation is done by the
South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project in Fremont who needs lots of material!
So that should solve issue, right? Nope.
the afternoon we had a presentation about the replacing of 2 wharves at Redwood
City. They removed 850 timber pilings with creosote and replaced with concrete.
They addressed Sea Level rise issues by estimating 1.5 feet by 2060 and also
accounted on seas surges also. The price adjustments for the inclusion of Sea
Level rise mitigation was minimal at $505,000 out of a 16.8 million dollar
was a update on the damage caused by a recent Hurricane in Mexico to the Long
Beach Breakwater. There are actually three separate breakwaters and there was
significant damage. This caused all sorts of havoc to the Port of Long Beach. I
had no idea.
next morning the Honorable 24th District Assemblyman Richard Gordon,
who is the chair for the Select Committee on Sea Level Rise, gave an update. He
is also on the Budget committee and suggested a placeholder in the budget for
sea level rise. When the item went to the Senate, they actually funded the item.
They are starting a state wide data base to collect information.
last panel discussed Dredge issues. In
San Francisco the cost range for disposal is between $10.55 a cubic yard and
$55.67. Options are Alcatraz, ocean and landfills.They dredge 200,000 cy a year. If they were
able to use in bay disposal site their cost would be 2.1 million. If they have
to do 20/40/40 or 20% in bay 40% ocean based and 40% landfill it would cost 5.4
million. Using the same methodology the cost to move the 3 million cy dredged in
all of San Francisco bay it would cost over 80 million dollars! In the past it
was 32 million dollars. For pier 39 the next dredge cycle could go from 892,000
to 2.5 million and would put the district in bankruptcy, as they only have 280
slip or lease owners. The Chevron Refinery in Richmond processes nearly ¼
million barrels of oil daily. They supply fuels for 65% of the jets in the bay
area and produces 100% of the base oils on the west coast! And they also have
dredging issues. Their dredge cost from 2002 to 2012 has more than doubled to 4
million dollars. Doesn’t take a genius to figure those additional costs go to
consumers. That would be us!